Key result
Heart-rate monitor pacing serves as a useful management tool for most surveyed ME/CFS patients.
Why the study?
People with ME/CFS often use pacing with a heart-rate monitor to manage activity intensities, but little research exists regarding their experiences with this approach.
What are the experiences and perceptions of people with ME/CFS regarding the use of pacing with a heart-rate monitor?
Cross-Sectional (n=488)
Yes
What are the experiences and perceptions of people with ME/CFS regarding the use of pacing with a heart-rate monitor?
Pacing with a heart rate monitor is perceived as a useful management tool by people with ME/CFS, highlighting the need for further trials to establish guidelines and minimize barriers.
May aid ME/CFS activity management; leaves open efficacy confirmation in RCTs.
Background People living with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) often use pacing with a heart-rate monitor (HRM) to manage their activity intensities to minimise time spent over their anaerobic threshold; however, there is little research related to their experiences of this approach.Objective To explore the experiences of people with ME/CFS of pacing with an HRM.Methods 488 people with ME/CFS completed an online international survey, and 27 agreed to online follow-up semi-structured interviews. The open answers from the survey and the data from the interviews were analysed using reflective thematic analysis.Results 87% of the survey participants and 88% of the interviewees were female. 49% of the survey participants and 44% of the interviewees were between 35 and 50 years. Their ME/CFS severity ranged from mild to severe. Some themes matched the questions: Benefits, Negatives, Support and Ideal Design, and some themes emerged from the data: Barriers, Body awareness/Intuition, Acceptance and Recommendations.Conclusions This study produced further insights into pacing with an HRM not previously published related to benefits, ideal design and support. New themes were also identified: Body awareness/Intuition, Barriers, Acceptance and Recommendations. The majority of people with ME/CFS in this study felt that pacing with an HRM is a useful management tool, but randomised controlled trials are needed to determine who benefits and identify guidelines to minimise the negatives and reduce the barriers for people with ME/CFS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clague-Baker et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) (n=488). Pacing with a heart-rate monitor was evaluated on Experiences of pacing with a heart-rate monitor. Pacing with a heart-rate monitor was considered a useful management tool by the majority of surveyed individuals with ME/CFS, revealing themes of benefits, barriers, and body awareness.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: