Examines how source congruence influences belief correction in political misinformation, indicating implications for AI in fact-checking.
As artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly deployed in fact-checking, questions remain about how audiences perceive AI-generated verdicts and the sources used to justify them. Drawing on motivated reasoning and research on source credibility, this study examines how fake news congruence and AI-cited source congruence jointly shape belief correction and message- and agent-level perceptions. In a U.S.-based 2 * 3 online experiment (N = 682), participants evaluated partisan misinformation followed by AI-generated verdicts citing politically congruent, incongruent, or third-party sources. Results show that while partisan congruence of fake news systematically shaped perceptions of AI verdicts and agents, source congruence operated conditionally, enhancing corrective effectiveness under co-directional configurations (citing in-group source to debunk in-group fake news). Findings highlight the role of source citations and expectation-based mechanisms in AI-generated fact-checking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: