Evaluates the impacts of road diet on traffic performance and intersection safety, suggesting benefits for urban design.
Road diets represent a cost-effective strategy for enhancing roadway safety; however, comprehensive frameworks integrating operational assessment with surrogate safety evaluation remain limited. This study develops an end-to-end microscopic simulation and machine learning framework to quantify operational and safety impacts of an urban road diet. A 0.22 mi segment of Frazier Avenue in Chattanooga, Tennessee, U.S.—recently converted from a four-lane undivided cross-section to a two-lane facility with a center left-turn lane—is modeled in SUMO using multi-month GridSmart trajectory counts, speed measurements, annual average daily traffic, and OpenStreetMap-derived geometry. A one-way analysis-of-variance-based sensitivity analysis identifies nine influential driver and vehicle parameters, which are calibrated via a genetic algorithm that minimizes speed root mean square error; validation against turning-movement counts using the Geoffrey E. Havers statistic satisfies FHWA acceptance criteria. Three 24 h scenarios are simulated (pre-diet, post-diet, and post-diet geometry with pre-diet demand), complemented by a demand sensitivity analysis up to +30% average daily trips. Corridor-wide, the road diet yields modest mobility penalties—average travel time increases by 4.3%, average speed decreases by 5.2%, and average waiting time increases by 40.7%—with more pronounced degradation westbound and intersection-specific queue growth. Surrogate safety measures at the major signalized intersection indicate substantial safety gains: total vehicle conflicts with time-to-collision (TTC) <3 s decrease by 45.7%, and critical conflicts with TTC <1 s decrease by 62.3%, with conflict hotspots markedly attenuated. Finally, an XGBoost regressor using pre-diet queue length, density, travel time, and speed predicts post-diet waiting times with R 2 = 0.905, demonstrating the potential of simulation-driven predictive models to support proactive corridor management and design of future road diet projects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khaleghian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: