In this article, Figs.1-4 were incorrectly numbered.Specifically, Fig. 1 should have been presented as Fig. 4, Fig. 2 as Fig. 1, Fig. 3 as Fig. 2, and Fig. 4 as Fig. 3.
Amoah et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: