Retrospective study investigates immunoglobulin changes and infection risk in MS patients treated with ocrelizumab, indicating monitoring needs.
Background and Objectives Ocrelizumab (OCR) is an effective anti-CD20 therapy for relapsing-remitting and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), but long-term effects on humoral immunity in real-world settings remain incompletely characterized. We investigated longitudinal changes in serum immunoglobulins, explored factors associated with hypogammaglobulinemia, and assessed associations with infection risk. Methods In this retrospective, single-center observational study, adult patients with MS treated with OCR between 2018 and 2023 were included after ≥ 2 treatment cycles. Patients underwent standardized clinical, radiological, and laboratory follow-up, including serial measurements of serum immunoglobulins and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) serology. Infections were graded according to CTCAE criteria. Results Of 116 patients (81% relapsing-remitting MS; median follow-up 2.3 years), approximately one-third developed lower limit of normal (LLN) IgM and one-sixth LLN IgG. Declines in immunoglobulins were class-specific and treatment-duration-dependent, most pronounced for IgM. Low baseline immunoglobulin levels were the strongest factors associated with LLN values, whereas demographic and disease-related factors were not. Prior immunotherapy, particularly fingolimod or interferon, was associated with hypogammaglobulinemia. Severe infections were rare (1.1 per 100 patient-years) and not consistently associated with LLN immunoglobulins. Discussion OCR induced predictable, class-specific declines in immunoglobulins. Despite frequent hypogammaglobulinemia - particularly affecting IgM - no association with an increased short- to mid-term risk of clinically relevant infections was observed, although limited event numbers restrict conclusions. These findings support individualized immunoglobulin monitoring focused on patients with low baseline levels or prior immunotherapy exposure and underscore the need for prospective studies to define clinically meaningful thresholds for intervention during long-term anti-CD20 therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bohn et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: