In vivo study evaluates topical propolis gel's effect on TGF-β levels in rabbits, suggesting potential as a healing aid.
Objectives: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of topical application of 10% Trigona sp. propolis gel on temporal changes in transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) levels during peri-implant soft-tissue healing around temporary anchorage devices (TADs). Material and Methods: This in vivo experimental study involved 18 male New Zealand White rabbits randomly allocated into two groups: A control group receiving TAD placement only and a treatment group receiving device placement with topical application of 10% Trigona sp. propolis gel. Serum TGF-β levels were measured on days 3, 7, and 14 following device placement using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Intragroup comparisons were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance followed by post hoc tests, while between-group comparisons were performed using independent samples t -tests. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Results: Repeated-measures analysis demonstrated a significant effect of time on TGF-β levels within each group ( p < 0.05). In both groups, mean TGF-β levels increased from day 3 to day 7 and subsequently decreased from day 7 to day 14. At all observation time points, the topical propolis group exhibited significantly higher TGF-β levels compared with the control group ( p < 0.05). Post hoc analysis revealed significant differences between specific observation intervals, with the greatest differences observed during the transition from the proliferative to the remodeling phase. Conclusion: Topical application of 10% Trigona sp. propolis gel modulated the temporal expression of TGF-β during peri-implant soft-tissue healing around TADs. Within the limitations of an animal model, topical propolis may serve as a biologically active adjunct to support peri-implant soft-tissue healing. Further clinical studies are required to confirm its potential applicability in orthodontic practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mukramin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: