Cross-sectional study evaluates a health behavior model in women with hypertension, suggesting factors for health improvement.
Purpose: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a hypothetical model of health-promoting behaviors among middle-aged women with hypertension, guided by the Information–Motivation–Behavioral Skills (IMB) framework. The endogenous variables were self-efficacy in chronic disease management and health-promoting behaviors, and the exogenous variables were hypertension-related knowledge, eHealth literacy, health attitudes, and social support.Methods: This cross-sectional study used an online structured questionnaire. A total of 331 middle-aged women diagnosed with hypertension participated. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS ver. 25.0 and IBM SPSS AMOS ver. 25.0 to test the hypothesized model and evaluate model fit.Results: The proposed model showed satisfactory fit to the data. Of the nine hypothesized pathways, six were statistically significant. Hypertension-related knowledge, social support, and self-efficacy in chronic disease management had significant direct effects on health-promoting behaviors. In contrast, eHealth literacy and health attitudes did not have statistically significant direct effects on health-promoting behaviors. Health attitudes and social support had significant indirect and total effects on health-promoting behaviors. The model explained 60.4% of the variance in health-promoting behaviors, indicating the importance of hypertension-related knowledge, health attitudes, social support, and self-efficacy in chronic disease management.Conclusion: The findings suggest that the proposed IMB-based model may help explain health-promoting behaviors among middle-aged women with hypertension. The results indicate that self-efficacy in chronic disease management may link motivational factors to behavioral outcomes and may inform future intervention research aimed at promoting health behavior change in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: