Research note examines padel's role in class differentiation among urban Indonesians, suggesting neoliberal implications for leisure consumption.
This research note examines the rapid growth of padel in urban Indonesia as a case of neoliberal leisure consumption. Drawing on critical discourse analysis of 15 media and industry texts published between 2024 and 2025, the study reads its material through two compatible lenses: Bourdieu’s theory of distinction and Foucault’s account of governmentality, including the technologies of the self and the self-surveillance associated with the panoptic gaze. It analyses how padel is discursively constructed not merely as a sport but as a leisure lifestyle that produces class-differentiated urban subjects. Three interconnected mechanisms are identified: padel as a technology of the self through which players take up leisure as a site of self-optimization; a pricing structure that sorts participants by class while being framed as inclusive; and what we term communitarian panopticism, a mode of leisure-based self-surveillance oriented toward social belonging rather than individual body-monitoring. The class being produced is specific rather than generic: an urban professional middle class, older and more affluent than the younger working-class public associated with futsal, marks itself off through where, how, and with whom it plays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sumarjono et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: