Cross-sectional study explores eHealth literacy's role in health behaviors among high school students, indicating a need for tailored interventions.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association between high school students’ eHealth literacy levels and their general health behaviors within the framework of the Transtheoretical Model.Methods: Employing a cross-sectional design, the study was conducted across three high schools during the 2024–2025 academic year. The study included 557 high school students. Data were collected using a Sociodemographic Data Form, the eHealth Literacy Scale for Adolescents, and the TTM-based General Health Behaviors Survey. All statistical procedures, including descriptive analyses, t-tests, ANOVA, and multiple linear regression, were carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics software.Results: The study sample consisted of 557 students, of whom 38.4% were 15 years old and 62.7% were female. eHealth literacy differed significantly by age, gender, perceived mental health, self-rated digital competencies, and daily internet/social media use (p < .05). In multiple linear regression, higher age, better perceived mental health, higher levels of digital competencies (computer and internet skills), and longer daily internet use duration predicted higher eHealth literacy (R² = .13, F (7,549) =11.46, p < .001). In addition, being in more advanced stages of high-fiber food consumption and smoking cessation was associated with higher eHealth literacy, consistent with TTM-based behavior change processes.Conclusion: The results suggest that eHealth literacy is a multidimensional concept influencing health behaviors beyond mere digital access. The Transtheoretical Model proved useful in explaining eHealth literacy. School-based programs especially for disadvantaged students should be tailored to individual needs and promote access to reliable digital health information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Üner et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: