Randomized trial evaluated a school intervention for weight control in children, indicating effective strategies for obesity prevention.
Background: Childhood overweight and obesity are increasing public health concerns internationally, contributing to significant long-term health risks. School-based interventions integrating policy and behavioural strategies are needed to address this issue. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a school-based intervention informed by the Thailand Healthy Living Strategy (THLS) for weight control and obesity prevention among school-age children. Design: Cluster randomised controlled trial. Setting: Eight primary schools located in Northeastern Thailand. Methods: A total of 214 students were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. The intervention consisted of five structured education sessions delivered over a 3-month period but also included policy development and parental engagement. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire at baseline (pretest) and at 1-month posttest following the intervention. Independent and paired t -tests were used to compare outcomes between and within groups. Results: At posttest, the intervention group showed significant improvements in self-efficacy (mean difference = 1.85, p = 0.03), outcome expectation (mean difference = 1.71, p = 0.03), and practice scores (mean difference = 8.40, p = 0.01). Between-group comparisons demonstrated significantly higher outcome expectations ( p < 0.001) and practice scores ( p < 0.001) in the intervention group compared to the control group. No significant differences were observed for knowledge between groups. Conclusions: The THLS-integrated school-based intervention improved self-efficacy, outcome expectations and obesity prevention practices among schoolchildren. These findings support the implementation of multi-component, school-based strategies involving policy, education, and family engagement to promote healthy lifestyles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Banchonhattakit et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: