Evaluates driving safety reliability under skew winds using a new W-VBI framework, indicating significant variability impact.
Wind-induced vehicle accidents on bridges depend not only on mean wind speed but also on turbulence and pavement roughness. Existing wind–vehicle–bridge interaction (W-VBI) studies typically rely on a limited number of stochastic wind and pavement realisations, restricting the quantification of record-to-record variability in driving safety. This study proposes a W-VBI framework that explicitly embeds this variability into the driving safety assessment. Applied to a twin box-girder bridge, the methodology combines stochastic simulations of turbulent wind and pavement profiles with aerodynamic coefficients obtained from wind-tunnel tests, which are used to define wind loads in the coupled W-VBI analysis. Over 85,000 nonlinear simulations are conducted for 11 wind angles, five gust levels, two high-sided vehicles, and speeds from 15–130 km/h. Vehicle overturning, side-slipping, and yawing probabilities are calculated, using bootstrapping techniques to evaluate the statistical stability of the simulations. Results show that wind and pavement randomness induce significant record-to-record variability in vehicle safety, while bootstrapping enables estimation of the minimum number of stochastic records required for statistically stable reliability assessments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cámara et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: