Explores metabolic roles in auxotrophic strains of E. coli, suggesting a method for gene annotation improvement.
Despite progress in automated gene annotation, many deficiencies and knowledge gaps remain, even for well-studied organisms. Of particular concern is the accuracy and detail of annotations for transporters of various organic substrates and products of metabolism and for enzymes that do not share sequence homology with well-characterized strains. Unfortunately, annotation errors present in earlier genome-scale metabolic (GSM) models propagate to newer models with few opportunities for later correction. Here, we introduce a systematic computational procedure that applies the Escherichia coli genome-scale metabolic model i ML1515, extended with transcriptional regulatory rules, to design auxotrophs that can grow on glucose but fail to grow on different carbon substrate(s) unless rescued with the addition of an ORF encoding a complementation metabolic function (transport and enzymatic reactions). Using the E. coli GSM model supplemented with regulatory rules that quantify growth/no growth outcomes on different organic substrates, we identified 258 distinct auxotrophic designs (97 single-gene, 142 double-gene, and 19 triple-gene knockouts) for which specific single functions can uniquely complement them. Experimental validation of 61 single-knockout strains demonstrated 59% confirmed auxotrophy and 28% partial auxotrophy. We envision that this collection of auxotrophic strains can be used to disambiguate the metabolic role of unannotated or poorly annotated genes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammadbeygi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: