Randomized trial evaluating nitrogen content in soil across different land uses, highlighting the impact of management practices.
The replacement of native vegetation may alter soil organic matter (SOM) quality and nitrogen (N) dynamics, because N is one of the main constituents of SOM. This study evaluated N content and stocks in humic fractions across different soil layers (0.00–0.50 m) of a Plinthosol in Tocantins State, Brazil, under different land uses: native Cerrado forest (control), eucalyptus, agriculture, and pasture. Soil samples were collected from five layers, and N content in the humic fractions, including fulvic acid (FA), humic acid (HA), and humin (Hum), was determined after chemical fractionation and dry combustion; N stocks were then calculated for each soil layer and for the entire profile. Total carbon (TC) content and stocks were also determined to contextualize N dynamics in SOM. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey’s test, Cohen’s d effect-size estimates, and principal component analysis (PCA) to assess differences among land uses and identify multivariate patterns. The eucalyptus land use showed the highest TC stocks and the greatest N accumulation in humic fractions, especially in the upper 0–0.40 m. Agricultural land use increased N-FA and N-Hum content and stocks but reduced N-HA relative to the control, whereas pasture reduced N-FA and N-Hum content and stocks while maintaining relatively stable N-HA. Across all land uses, N-Hum was the dominant N reservoir, and humic substances accounted for approximately 59–74% of total soil N stocks. PCA indicated that land use was the main factor associated with N distribution among humic fractions, whereas soil depth had a secondary but consistent effect. These changes indicate that SOM quality was affected by land-use conversion, particularly under more intensively managed or degraded systems, suggesting that improved soil management strategies are needed to preserve N retention and humification processes in converted Cerrado landscapes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almeida et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: