Retrospective review shows that rapid on-site evaluation improves diagnostic adequacy in thyroid fine-needle aspiration, suggesting cost-effective solutions.
INTRODUCTION: Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is thought to increase the adequacy of thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsiesand reduce overall cost. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of thyroid FNA cases from patients who presented to the endocrinology outpatient clinic of a tertiary center between May 2018 and March 2023. A cytopathologist performing ROSE in an FNA room in the endocrinologyclinic was available during the period June 2019-March 2023. Between May 2018 and June 2019, ROSE was not available. RESULTS: Of 1614 FNAs, 1212 were performed with ROSE by a cytopathologist and 402 without ROSE. The number of nondiagnostic FNA cases was 297 (24.6%) with ROSE and 140 (34.8%) without ROSE. In Group A (with ROSE), a total of 94 of 1212 nodules underwent repeatbiopsy, corresponding to a rate of 7.75%. In Group B (without ROSE), 59 of 402 nodules required repeat biopsy, yielding a rate of 14.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Although cytopathologist assistance during thyroid FNA increases costs, it lowers insufficiency rates by reducing the need for repeat procedures and expedites the time to definitive diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soltanova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: