Key result
Clinical obesity by new anthropometric criteria is linked to ~3-fold higher CAC progression.
Why the study?
Does the new definition of obesity better identify subclinical cardiovascular disease in persons with HIV compared to the old definition?
Cohort (n=74)
Does the new definition of obesity better identify subclinical cardiovascular disease in persons with HIV compared to the old definition?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 36%
p-value: p=0.006
The new anthropometric-based definition of obesity recategorizes more persons with HIV as obese and may better identify those at risk for subclinical cardiovascular disease progression.
OBJECTIVE: A new definition of obesity places emphasis on anthropometrics rather than BMI. We explored how PWH shifted categories when using the new definition of obesity and the association to subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD). DESIGN: A secondary data analysis of a 1) cross-sectional and 2) longitudinal cohort from a completed trial focused on CVD among PWH. METHODS: Obesity was defined as 2 measures of abnormal anthropometrics, or 1 measure of abnormal anthropometrics and a BMI≥30 kg/m2, or BMI≥40 kg/m2. Obesity was further classified as clinical obesity if there was evidence of a clinical manifestation. RESULTS: 45%(33/74) vs. 78%(58/74) of PWH were categorized as obesity based on the old vs. new definitions for obesity. Among PWH with BMI < 30 kg/m2, 61%(25/41) were reclassified as obesity based on the new definition. The proportion with coronary artery calcium(CAC) score>0 was increased among the clinical vs. preclinical obesity groups (83% vs. 50%). A higher proportion with CAC>0 was also detected comparing clinical obesity vs. the old definition of obesity (83% vs. 71%). In the longitudinal analysis, among those randomized to placebo in the parent study, CAC increased over a 12-month period among 100% with clinical obesity vs. vs. 36% with preclinical obesity(P = .006). Change in CAC score was higher in the clinical vs. preclinical obesity group [9(6, 197) vs. 0(0, 5), P = .02]. CONCLUSION: The new definition recategorizes more PWH with obesity not previously considered to have obesity using BMI alone, which may be useful for capturing those with abdominal adiposity. In addition, the recategorization may also have clinical implications for detecting more subclinical CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walpert et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in HIV (n=74). Clinical obesity (new anthropometrics-based definition) vs. Preclinical obesity was evaluated on Increase in coronary artery calcium (CAC) over a 12-month period (p=0.006). Clinical obesity defined by new anthropometric criteria was associated with a 100% vs 36% increase in coronary artery calcium over 12 months compared to preclinical obesity (P=0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: