Randomized trial evaluates ferric chloride’s effectiveness in reducing contaminants in raw river water, suggesting improved treatment methods.
This study evaluated the applicability of ferric chloride (FeCl₃) as a coagulant for drinking water treatment using raw water from the lower Nakdong River and compared its performance with aluminum sulfate (alum). Jar-tests and pilot-scale experiments were conducted using raw water from the Maeri intake station. Water quality parameters including turbidity, total organic carbon (TOC), chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), color, alkalinity, and pH were monitored. Dissolved organic matter (DOM) fractions were characterized using LC-OCD, while disinfection by-product formation potentials (THMFP and HAAFP) were measured to assess the removal efficiency of organic precursors. The performance of a hybrid coagulant (alum mixed with FeCl₃) was also investigated. Results showed that FeCl₃ outperformed alum in removing turbidity, TOC, and Chl-a in both batch and continuous experiments. Notably, FeCl₃ exhibited superior removal of humic substances (HS) and building blocks (BB) fractions, resulting in a more significant reduction in THMFP and HAAFP. Although the supernatant color increased initially with FeCl₃ application, the filtered water color remained lower than that of alum, suggesting that residual color-causing agents were primarily particulate microflocs. Furthermore, FeCl₃ effectively reduced the DOC load delivered to the subsequent granular activated carbon (GAC) process, enhancing overall treatment efficiency. FeCl₃ is a promising alternative or supplement to alum for treating raw water with high organic and algal content, provided that alkalinity and pH are appropriately controlled during practical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: