Key result
Neighborhood environment and lifestyle behaviors linked to cardiovascular risk development over 35 years.
Population
5,115 Black or White men and women ages 18 to 30 years from four U.S. communities
Follow-up
35 years
Authors
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“We identified four heart health trajectories during young adulthood. These patterns were strongly tied to later outcomes. People who maintained high LE8 scores from ages 18 to 30 had the lowest risk for heart attacks and strokes, while those who remained at moderate levels had about twice the risk. Participants whose scores declined from moderate to low had a tenfold higher risk of cardiovascular events in midlife. Even small improvements in LE8 during early adulthood were linked to better outcomes than staying stable or declining.”
“The usual method is to calculate risk by risk factors measured at one point in time. Even in clinical practice, we still keep working on risks factors measured at a specific day. I think we should really move towards this approach, because it brings new findings, new perspectives, and new predictions.”
“It speaks to the fact that we really need to be intervening at a young age. If we wait until people are 40 or 50 to start thinking about hypertension, for the majority of blacks, we've waited too late.”
Supports early risk factor screening in young adults; leaves open whether modification reduces events.
Cohort (n=5,115)
Yes
The CARDIA study serves as a foundational 35-year longitudinal resource for understanding the life course epidemiology of cardiovascular health, disease, and racial disparities.
Lloyd‐Jones et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular risk (n=5,115). Neighborhood environment and lifestyle behaviors was evaluated. Over 35 years of follow-up, the CARDIA cohort of 5,115 young adults established key associations between neighborhood environment, lifestyle behaviors, and the development of cardiovascular risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: