Key result
A two-session behaviorally focused intervention providing personalized cardiovascular risk messages and counseling was feasible and acceptable in young adults with a family history of CVD/CHD.
Why the study?
Is a behaviorally focused intervention providing personalized risk messages and lifestyle counseling feasible and acceptable in young adults with a family history of CVD/CHD?
Is a behaviorally focused intervention providing personalized risk messages and lifestyle counseling feasible and acceptable in young adults with a family history of CVD/CHD?
A behaviorally focused intervention providing personalized cardiovascular risk messages and lifestyle counseling is feasible and acceptable for young adults with a family history of CVD.
Supports progression to efficacy trials in young adults with family history; leaves open clinical adoption pending randomized data.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a behaviorally focused intervention designed to increase perceived cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD) risk in young adults with a family history (FH) of CVD/CHD. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: Single group, pre-post-test design. Fifteen, mostly female (n = 13, 86.7%), White, young adults (mean age 20.8 years) with a minimum of a high school education with a FH of CVD/CHD. MEASURES: Feasibility examined the recruitment strategy, study procedures, appropriateness and quality of the study instruments, and problems that occurred during delivery of the intervention. Acceptability examined participants' engagement in the in person sessions and at home exercises and their feedback about the intervention. INTERVENTION: Two, in person sessions provided personalized, tailored messages about 10-year and lifetime CHD risk based on risk factors, FH from a three-generation pedigree, lipid levels, blood pressure, and smoking status, and brief counseling about how to engage in a healthy lifestyle to decrease CVD/CHD risk. RESULTS: The intervention was feasible and acceptable. Participants requested more information on healthy food choices, including which foods to avoid and which exercises most improve cardiovascular health. CONCLUSIONS: Although requiring refinement, the intervention has potential public health implications and deserves further testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imes et al. (2014) studied Family history of CVD/CHD (n=15). Behaviorally focused cardiovascular risk reduction intervention was evaluated on Feasibility and acceptability. A two-session behaviorally focused intervention providing personalized cardiovascular risk messages and counseling was feasible and acceptable in young adults with a family history of CVD/CHD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: