Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Amid ongoing socio-ecological crises, AIED promises a bright future by claiming to fix educational problems and thereby better prepare students for real-world challenges. While this problem-solving rationale may appear neutral, it is deeply entwined with how society manages other/ness as ‘dirt’ to be removed. Against this backdrop, this study focuses on the social mechanisms of disposability at work in AIED. I first interrogate how techno-solutionism underpins edtech as a co-articulation of edu-fixes and techno-fixes, unsettling the linear narrative in which technologies solve educational problems. Integrating waste as an analytic lens, I then examine how the problem-solution binary is implicated in the stigmatisation and control of other/ness in the name of improvement. Finally, I investigate how AIED wastifies and hygienises other/ness, revealing a pedagogic expression of waste capitalism. Based on this discussion, I suggest reimagining education in an AI era by reinterpreting waste as generative possibilities for otherwise educational relationships.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hyena Kim (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: