Cross-sectional study finds respiratory oscillometry improves symptom assessment in individuals post-COVID-19.
BACKGROUND The long-term pulmonary sequelae of COVID-19 are incompletely characterized. Early studies using conventional pulmonary function tests (PFT) identified a predominant restrictive defect that improved over time despite persistent respiratory symptoms. Respiratory oscillometry is a different PFT modality that provides highly sensitive information regarding lung mechanics to complement spirometry. This cross-sectional study aims to characterize spirometry and oscillometry at 6 months post-COVID-19 in patients with mild-moderate acute infections, and assess their associations with respiratory symptoms and functional status using the 6-min walk test (6MWT).METHODS Patients in the Canadian COVID-19 Longitudinal Cohort Study were enrolled between Aug 2020-Mar 2022 for further evaluation with oscillometry and spirometry. Complete data, including 6MWT and Borg Dyspnea scale assessment, at 6 months post-COVID-19 infection were available in 213 of 549 patients for analysis. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit were excluded from analysis.RESULTS The cohort (61.0% women, median age; 44.9 years) comprised of 83.1% outpatients and 16.9% hospitalized ward patients. The overall prevalence of respiratory symptoms was high (54.3%) and similar in the 2 groups. Overall, 42.7% of all patients had abnormal oscillometry while only 16.6% had abnormal spirometry. Notably, 29.8% of patients with normal spirometry had abnormal oscillometry. Oscillometry was associated with the 6MWT, total respiratory symptoms and the change in the Borg dyspnea score pre- and post-6MWT(ΔBorg-dyspnea) in contrast to spirometry where little association was found.CONCLUSIONS Oscillometry detected abnormal lung mechanics that were associated with functional impairment and respiratory symptoms but indiscernible by spirometry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Numakura et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: