Review evaluates pharmacotherapy approaches for stimulant use disorder, highlighting recent combination strategies and outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Stimulant use disorder (StUD), including cocaine and methamphetamine use disorders, remains a major unmet clinical need with no approved pharmacotherapies. Despite strong mechanistic rationale, dopamine transporter (DAT)-directed strategies have largely failed to translate into consistent clinical benefit. AREAS COVERED: This review evaluates the contemporary pharmacotherapy landscape for StUD, focusing on phase II/III clinical trials and systematic reviews published from January 2020- April 2026. Evidence was identified through PubMed/MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov and synthesized narratively due to study heterogeneity. Therapeutic approaches are organized by mechanistic class, including DAT-targeting agents, non-DAT strategies (multi-monoaminergic, glutamatergic, serotonergic, and neuroimmune), and combination pharmacotherapy. Across studies, monotherapies generally demonstrate limited or inconsistent efficacy, although mirtazapine has shown the most consistent positive findings. Combination pharmacotherapy approaches, particularly naltrexone-bupropion, have generated some of the most encouraging clinical results to date. The role of DAT is reappraised within emerging biological frameworks and a systems-level model of addiction. EXPERT OPINION: Current evidence supports a reappraisal of DAT as one component of a broader neurobiology of stimulant addiction. Future therapeutic development may benefit from moving beyond DAT-centric strategies toward integrated, multi-target approaches. Combination pharmacotherapy represents a promising direction for investigation, although available evidence remains heterogeneous and requires substantial clinical validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peña et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: