Study evaluated bioash-GGBFS for enhancing contaminant immobilization in contaminated soil, highlighting its durability.
Conventional validation of low-carbon stabilization binders often relies on short curing periods and batch leaching tests, which do not adequately capture long-term durability or transport-controlled contaminant release. In this study, a bioash–GGBFS binder was evaluated for stabilization/solidification of metal-contaminated soil from Näsudden, Sweden, using an integrated program of extended curing, wet–dry and freeze–thaw cycling, and standardized percolation and diffusion leaching tests. The treated mixture (50% soil, 35% bioash, and 15% GGBFS) developed unconfined compressive strength in the MPa range and maintained high strength after durability exposure, with 1635 ± 308 kPa after wet–dry cycling and 2047 ± 100 kPa after freeze–thaw cycling. Percolation testing at L/S = 10 showed strong reductions in leaching compared with untreated soil, including 96% for As, 98% for Cd, 90% for Pb, 92% for Zn, 88% for Ni, and 65% for Cu. Diffusion testing confirmed low release for most elements, while Cu showed the highest cumulative release and mobility, indicating an element-specific limitation. Overall, the results demonstrate that the bioash–GGBFS binder can provide both durable mechanical performance and sustained immobilization of most priority contaminants under transport-relevant conditions. The findings support its potential as a low-carbon alternative for stabilization and reuse of contaminated soils, although additional measures may be needed where Cu governs compliance
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khasevani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: