Randomized trial compares 15-second versus 30-second mitomycin C applications in preventing corneal haze in moderate myopia, suggesting shorter exposure may enhance safety.
Purpose To compare the efficacy of 15-s versus 30-s intraoperative applications of 0.02% mitomycin C (MMC) in preventing corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for moderate myopia. Methods This prospective, paired-eye study enrolled 50 patients (100 eyes) with bilateral moderate myopia (−3.00 to −6.00 D). Each patient underwent bilateral wavefront-optimized PRK. One eye was randomized to receive 0.02% MMC for 15 s, and the fellow eye received it for 30 s. The primary outcome was the incidence and severity of corneal haze, graded on a 0–4 scale at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. The secondary outcome was uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA). Results The median age was 25.5 years (range, 18–53). Preoperative refractive errors were symmetrical between paired eyes ( P > 0.05). Postoperative corneal haze was minimal and transient. Median haze scores were 0 at all timepoints beyond the 1-week visit. Haze severity decreased significantly over time in both groups ( P < 0.01), with no statistically significant differences between the 15-s and 30-s groups at any follow-up visit (P ≥ 0.08). At 6 months, the median UDVA was 0.00 logMAR in both groups ( P = 1.0). Conclusions A 15-s intraoperative application of 0.02% MMC resulted in comparable rates of corneal haze prevention and excellent visual outcomes to a 30-s application in preventing corneal haze and achieving excellent visual outcomes after wavefront-optimized PRK for moderate myopia. Shorter exposure times may enhance safety by minimizing potential cytotoxic risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okasha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: