Investigates AI for correcting utility-system P&IDs, suggesting improvements in accuracy and efficiency.
Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) are central engineering documents whose review remains largely manual, time‐consuming and error‐prone. We investigate generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for P&ID revision. Specifically, we interpret P&ID correction as a machine translation task. Machine‐readable DEXPI P&IDs are converted with pyDEXPI into attributed graphs, and corrected topologies are represented as generalized SFILES sequences (GGILES). Based on this representation, we adapt a transformer‐based Graph‐to‐SFILES model to utility‐system P&IDs and train it on a synthetic dataset of paired erroneous and corrected diagrams. On this benchmark, the model achieves high accuracy and learns attribute‐dependent error patterns. Tests on five industrial DEXPI P&IDs reveal a gap between synthetic and industrial data, highlighting limitations in data availability and coverage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balhorn et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: