Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates the chemical profile and antioxidant capacity of propolis in a specific region, indicating its bioactive potential.
This study presents an integrated chemical, palynological, and spectrophotometric characterization of a propolis sample collected from the Karasüver (Kangal, Sivas) region, located in the transitional zone between Central and Eastern Anatolia. The volatile and semi-volatile chemical composition was determined by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS), the botanical origin was evaluated by microscopic pollen analysis, and the total phenolic content (TPC) was quantified using the Folin–Ciocalteu method. GC-MS analysis revealed a distinctive chemical profile dominated by flavonoids, followed by aromatic compounds, whereas naturally occurring esters were present only at minor levels. The high concentrations of pinostrobin (14.48%), chrysin (14.40%), and pinocembrin (7.63%) clearly classify this sample as a characteristic Poplar (Populus) type propolis. Palynological analysis identified Asteraceae (20.24%) and Fabaceae (13.50%) as the dominant pollen families, reflecting the steppe vegetation of the region. Additionally, the presence of Pinaceae (9.58%) pollen is consistent with the detection of specific sesquiterpenes (e.g., β-eudesmol) in the GC-MS profile, indicating a secondary resin contribution from coniferous trees. Although Populus pollen was detected at low levels, the chemical abundance of poplar-specific markers confirms that Populus spp. are the primary resin source. The total phenolic content was determined as 216.12 ± 0.58 mg GAE/g, demonstrating a very high antioxidant potential. Compared to previous regional studies reporting lower values, these results highlight a strong association between the flavonoid-rich chemical profile and the elevated TPC value. Overall, Sivas–Kangal (Karasüver) propolis represents a high-quality bioactive product with a rich phenolic composition and significant antioxidant capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Öztürk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: