Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyzes the health impacts of net-zero scenarios across the USA, suggesting equity concerns in residual emissions.
Achieving net-zero targets reduces greenhouse gas emissions and their co-pollutants, thereby improving air quality; however, the magnitude and distribution of these improvements depend on the amount and location of residual emissions offset by carbon dioxide removal (CDR). Here we integrate a series of models and datasets to analyse community-scale particulate matter (PM2.5) impacts of different net-zero scenarios across the contiguous USA. These scenarios avoid many PM2.5-related deaths compared with a reference case, decreasing from around 200,000 to 160,000 and 130,000 deaths in 2050 in the high- and low-CDR scenarios, respectively. However, the low-CDR pathway leads to lower residual emissions and brings greater health improvements that disproportionately benefit non-white and low-income groups. Our results thus suggest that, in the absence of deliberate transition planning, large-scale CDR deployment could be at odds with the equitable distribution of climate mitigation-related health benefits in the USA. The scale of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) could determine the extent of co-emitted air pollutants in net-zero scenarios and potential health impacts. By linking a series of models and datasets, researchers find that low-CDR pathways lead to a more equitable distribution of health benefits across the USA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergero et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: