Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Meta-analysis assesses platelet-related parameters in endometriosis, suggesting MPV's diagnostic potential.
Endometriosis (EMS) is a prevalent gynecological condition, and its diagnosis remains challenging. Hematological indicators such as platelet count (PLT), mean platelet volume (MPV), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have recently received attention for their potential diagnostic value in EMS. To assess the association of PLT, MPV, and PLR in EMS by a meta-analysis. We systematically searched Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to June 2025 for studies on the association of platelet-related parameters (PLT, MPV, and PLR) with EMS. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for PLT, MPV, and PLR using a random-effects model. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata16.0. Nineteen studies with 5675 subjects were included. Overall pooled analyses showed no statistically significant differences in PLT (SMD 0.35 [− 0.02, 0.71], I²=97.6%, P = 0.063) and PLR (SMD 0.24 [− 0.16, 0.64], I²=96.6%, P = 0.224) between EMS and non-EMS populations. However, MPV was significantly elevated in EMS compared with non-EMS populations (SMD 0.30 [0.09, 0.52], I²=82.7%, P = 0.006). Subgroup analyses by control group type revealed context-dependent associations. Compared with benign gynecological conditions (e.g., ovarian cysts, uterine fibroids), EMS showed significantly elevated PLT (SMD 0.20 [0.01, 0.38], I²=53.7%, P = 0.042) and PLR (SMD 0.33 [0.22, 0.43], I²=0.0%, P < 0.01). PLT was significantly lower in EMS than in ovarian cancer (SMD − 0.56 [− 0.81, − 0.32], I²=0.0%, P < 0.001). MPV was significantly elevated in EMS compared with healthy individuals (SMD 0.46 [0.11, 0.81], I²=84.7%, P = 0.010), whereas no significant difference was observed between EMS and other benign gynecological conditions (SMD 0.04 [− 0.10, 0.19], I²=0.0%, P = 0.547). MPV shows potential as an adjunctive marker for EMS, while PLT and PLR have limited independent diagnostic value but may be useful in specific clinical contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: