Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Discussion note critiques Lamy's challenge to Malebranche's philosophy, highlighting implications for early modern physics.
In a recent issue of the Journal of the History of Philosophy , Steven Nadler draws attention to the neglected argument of François Lamy that Malebranche ’s doctrine of occasionalism conflicts with his own criticism of Descartes ’s appeal to a “force of rest ” in physics. Nadler claims that this argument is well worth considering insofar as its conclusion seems to be “absolutely correct. ” In this discussion note, I offer reasons to doubt that Lamy is in fact correct in charging that there is an internal tension on this point in Malebranche ’s system. I also briefly consider the significance of Malebranche ’s critique of Descartes for early modern Cartesian physics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tad M. Schmaltz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: