Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review highlights severe complications from late esophageal stent migration, suggesting enhanced surveillance.
Background: Self-expanding esophageal stents (SEMS) are widely used in the management of malignant dysphagia and a variety of benign esophageal conditions. Although stent migration is a well-recognized complication, late migration -defined as occurring ≥4 weeks after stent placement- is less well characterized and may result in severe, life-threatening emergencies. These events are frequently underrecognized and not consistently addressed within current surveillance practice. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases focusing on acute clinical presentations following late esophageal stent migration. Results: Out of 343 unique articles, 53 studies were included, involving 53 patients with a median time to presentation of 3 months after stent placement, and 12.5% of cases occurring more than one year later. The gastrointestinal tract was the most frequent site of migration (64.2%), followed by airway/respiratory (15%), thoracic (13.2%), and vascular structures (5.7%). Clinical presentations included small bowel obstruction (30.2%), gastrointestinal or thoracic perforation, respiratory failure, sepsis, and catastrophic hemorrhage. Surgical intervention was required in most cases. Overall mortality was 28.3%, with especially poor outcomes in cases complicated by vascular or airway involvement. Conclusions: Late esophageal stent migration represents a clinically significant but underrecognized cause of acute surgical emergencies. Risk-adapted surveillance, prompt diagnostic imaging, and early multidisciplinary management are essential to improve outcomes and enhance the long-term safety of esophageal stent therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mylonakis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: