Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Population-based cohort study finds no independent link between PPI use and prostate cancer diagnosis or outcomes, suggesting reassessment of treatment implications.
Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use has been associated with increased prostate cancer (PCa) risk in case-control and cohort studies of men with a negative prostate biopsy. We estimated the association of cumulative PPI use with PCa diagnosis and outcomes in a biopsy-naïve cohort of men using provincewide-linked administrative data from Ontario, Canada, including men ≥66 years with no prior PCa diagnosis, biopsy, or treatment and no PPI/H2-blocker prescriptions within the year preceding study inclusion (January 2003–December 2018). The primary outcome was time to PCa diagnosis. Associations were evaluated using univariable/multivariable logistic regression models with complementary log-log-modeling. Median follow-up was 9.2 years (n=559,425), and 30.2% had any PPI use during follow-up. Annual PPI use increased from 2.4% (2003) to 13.8% (2019). Cumulative PPI use was associated with lower PCa diagnosis rates (hazard ratio [HR] for highest user quintile versus non-users: 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71–0.79). Following adjustment for the frequency of general practitioner visits and PSA tests in the preceding two years, PPI use was no longer associated with PCa diagnosis (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.93–1.05). No association was observed between PPI use and rates of clinically significant or high-grade PCa (HRs: 0.99 and 1.04, respectively). Cumulative PPI use was associated with up to 17% lower rates of a first androgen deprivation therapy prescription or bilateral orchiectomy. Cumulative PPI use was not associated with PCa diagnosis rates, including clinically significant and high-grade PCa. These findings do not support an independent association between PPI use and PCa risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sayyid et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: