Key result
Hybrid telehealth emerges as the preferred stakeholder approach for goal-concordant deprescribing during home health transitions.
Why the study?
While deprescribing can reduce risks from inappropriate polypharmacy in older adults with multimorbidity in home health care, fragmented communication during hospital-to-home transitions remains a major barrier.
A hybrid telehealth model combining remote prescriber consultations with in-home clinician support is preferred by stakeholders to facilitate deprescribing during hospital-to-home transitions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Telehealth may help overcome transition barriers to deprescribing; leaves open whether it reduces polypharmacy harms in multimorbid older adults.
Background Multimorbidity affects most older adults in home health care (HHC), leading to inappropriate polypharmacy and increased risks for adverse outcomes. While deprescribing can mitigate these risks, fragmented communication during hospital‐to‐home transitions remains a major barrier. This study explored stakeholder perspectives on using telehealth to facilitate deprescribing for older adults with multimorbidity while receiving post‐acute HHC. Methods We conducted semi‐structured interviews with 44 stakeholders across 12 U.S. states, including 14 HHC patients and 30 clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and HHC nurses). Guided by the socioecological model of deprescribing, interviews explored factors across individual, interpersonal, organizational, and societal levels associated with telehealth use in deprescribing. Analysis followed a phased, iterative approach with independent double‐coding and interprofessional team consensus to ensure credibility. Results Findings categorized telehealth as a promising tool to align medications with the “4Ms” (Medications, Mentation, Mobility, and What Matters) through goal‐concordant deprescribing. At the individual level, stakeholders noted that telehealth readiness depended on patient cognition and digital literacy. At the interpersonal level, telehealth facilitated real‐time multidisciplinary “virtual huddles” that reduced communication delays but could occasionally overwhelm patients and may be logistically challenging to schedule. Organizational barriers included reimbursement constraints and complex synchronous scheduling. Societal factors include equitable access for rural or low‐income populations, populations who may benefit the most from telehealth‐enabled deprescribing due to challenges in accessing care. Stakeholders emphasized a hybrid approach which pairs virtual prescriber consultation with in‐home support of a clinician to provide context and assist with implementation for patient‐centered deprescribing. Conclusions Telehealth can support goal‐concordant deprescribing during post‐acute care transitions in HHC. A hybrid model, one that combines remote prescriber consultations with in‐home clinician support, is the preferred approach to bridge coordination gaps. To maximize impact, future efforts are needed to improve reimbursement, infrastructure, and scheduling to integrate telehealth into routine deprescribing workflows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied Multimorbidity in older adults (n=44). Telehealth to support deprescribing was evaluated on Stakeholder perspectives on factors associated with telehealth use in deprescribing. Interviews with 44 stakeholders identified telehealth as a promising tool for goal-concordant deprescribing during home health care transitions, with a hybrid model being the preferred approach.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: