Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates how family ownership affects innovation success in micro-firms, suggesting management type plays a crucial role.
Firm ownership and management are essential drivers of firm innovation. Yet micro-firms, where ownership and control are closely related, are often overlooked in empirical studies. Using an innovation production function approach and survey data from 2,658 UK and Irish micro-firms, we investigate the influence of firm ownership and management on innovation success, i.e., converting new innovations into sales. Drawing on agency theory, we differentiate micro-firms by ownership (family-owned vs. nonfamily-owned) and family firms by management (family-managed vs. nonfamily-managed). Our Tobit regression analysis reveals that ownership of micro-firms matters for innovation, with family-owned innovator firms experiencing less innovation success than nonfamily firms. When family firms hire a manager from outside the family, they achieve innovation success similar to that of nonfamily firms. However, outcome equivalence does not imply mechanism equivalence, as our moderation analysis reveals that nonfamily managers do not derive the same incremental benefits from internal R&D.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lenihan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: