Key result
High baseline medication burden reduced the likelihood of achieving intensive SBP goals (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.85-0.97) and increased cardiovascular events (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.14-1.70).
Why the study?
Total medication burden may be associated with poor systolic blood pressure control, prompting investigation into its association with clinical outcomes and whether SBP intervention effects varied by baseline medication burden.
Does intensive systolic blood pressure control improve clinical outcomes and achieve blood pressure targets similarly in patients with high versus low baseline medication burden?
RCT (n=9,361)
Intensive or standard SBP goal
Does intensive systolic blood pressure control improve clinical outcomes and achieve blood pressure targets similarly in patients with high versus low baseline medication burden?
Relative Risk: 0.91 (95% CI 0.85–0.97)
p-value: p=<0.001 for interaction
Intensive blood pressure lowering provides similar relative cardiovascular benefits regardless of baseline medication burden, despite high-burden patients having more difficulty achieving strict systolic blood pressure targets.
High medication burden hinders intensive SBP goal achievement and raises CV events; leaves open whether relative benefits of intensive control are modified by polypharmacy.
Total medication burden (antihypertensive and nonantihypertensive medications) may be associated with poor systolic blood pressure (SBP) control. We investigated the association of baseline medication burden and clinical outcomes and whether the effect of the SBP intervention varied according to baseline medication burden in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). Participants were randomized to intensive or standard SBP goal (below 120 or 140 mm Hg, respectively); n=3769 participants with high baseline medication burden (≥5 medications) and n=5592 with low burden (<5 medications). Primary outcome: differences in SBP. Secondary outcomes: 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale and modified Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medications measured at baseline and 12 months and incident cardiovascular disease events and serious adverse events throughout the trial. Participants in the intensive group with high versus low medication burden were less likely to achieve their SBP goal at 12 months (risk ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85–0.97) but not in the standard group (risk ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.93–1.03; P interaction <0.001). High medication burden was associated with increased cardiovascular disease events (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.14–1.70) and serious adverse events (hazard ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.24–1.45), but the effect of intensive versus standard treatment did not vary between medication burden groups ( P interaction >0.5). Medication burden had minimal association with adherence or satisfaction. High baseline medication burden was associated with worse intensive SBP control and higher rates of cardiovascular disease events and serious adverse events. The relative benefits and risks of intensive SBP goals were similar regardless of medication burden. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01206062
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Derington et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Hypertension (n=9,361). High medication burden (≥5 medications) vs. Low medication burden (<5 medications) was evaluated on Differences in SBP (achievement of SBP goal at 12 months in the intensive group) (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.97, p=<0.001 for interaction). High baseline medication burden reduced the likelihood of achieving intensive SBP goals (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.85-0.97) and increased cardiovascular events (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.14-1.70).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: