Key result
Physical training programs moderately increased heart rate variability time-domain variables, including RMSSD (SMD 0.478), in children and adolescents with chronic diseases.
Why the study?
The study analyzed the effects of physical training programs on heart rate variability, as a measure of sympathovagal balance, in children and adolescents with chronic diseases.
Do physical training programs improve heart rate variability in children and adolescents with chronic diseases?
Meta-Analysis (n=252)
Do physical training programs improve heart rate variability in children and adolescents with chronic diseases?
Standardized Mean Difference: 0.478 (95% CI 0.227–0.729)
p-value: p=<0.001
Physical training programs can modulate heart rate variability, primarily improving time-domain variables, in children and adolescents with chronic diseases.
Supports exercise training to improve autonomic function in children/adolescents with chronic diseases; extends meta-analytic evidence to this population.
This study analyzed the effects of physical training programs on heart rate variability, as a measure of sympathovagal balance, in children and adolescents with chronic diseases. Relevant articles were systematically searched in Pubmed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and Embase scientific databases. We performed a meta-analysis using an inverse variance heterogeneity model. Effect size calculation was based on the standardized mean differences between pre- and post-intervention assessments, assuring at least a single-group repeated-measures model for each extracted group. Ten studies (252 participants) were included, seven in obese subjects, two in type-1 diabetes, and one in cerebral palsy. When time-domain variables were analyzed, exercise was found to moderately increase RMSSD (SMD=0.478; 95%CI: 0.227 to 0.729; p<0.001), SDNN (SMD=0.367; 95%CI: 0.139 to 0.595; p=0.002) and pNN50 (SMD=0.817; 95%CI: 0.139 to 0.595; p=0.002). As for frequency-domain variables, exercise presented a moderate increasing effect on HF (SMD=0.512; 95%CI: 0.240 to 0.783; p<0.001), a negligible effect for LF (SMD=0.077; 95%CI: –0.259 to 0.412; p<0.001) and a non-significant reduction for LF/HF (SMD=–0.519; 95%CI: -1.162 to 0.124; p=0.114). In conclusion, physical training programs are able to modulate heart rate variability in children and adolescents with chronic diseases, affecting mainly the time-domain variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Estévez-González et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Chronic diseases (obesity, type-1 diabetes, cerebral palsy) (n=252). Physical training programs vs. Pre-intervention (baseline) was evaluated on Root Mean Square of standard deviation of N-N intervals (RMSSD) (SMD 0.478, 95% CI 0.227 to 0.729, p=<0.001). Physical training programs moderately increased heart rate variability time-domain variables, including RMSSD (SMD 0.478), in children and adolescents with chronic diseases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: