Key result
Preoperative Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing and walk tests predicted adverse postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery, though meta-analysis was precluded.
Why the study?
Abdominal cancer surgery is linked to substantial morbidity in older patients, making it necessary to describe and compare objective physical tests used to assess preoperative physical status and predict postoperative outcomes.
Does objective preoperative physical assessment predict postoperative outcomes in patients aged 65 and older undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery?
Systematic Review
Does objective preoperative physical assessment predict postoperative outcomes in patients aged 65 and older undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery?
Preoperative CPET and field walk tests can predict adverse postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery, whereas muscle strength tests have limited value.
May aid preoperative risk stratification with CPET and walk tests in older abdominal cancer patients; leaves open prospective validation before changing practice.
Background: Abdominal cancer surgery is associated with considerable morbidity in older patients. Assessment of preoperative physical status is therefore essential. The aim of this review was to describe and compare the objective physical tests that are currently used in abdominal cancer surgery in the older patient population with regard to postoperative outcomes. Methods: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched until 31 December 2020. Noninterventional cohort studies were eligible if they included patients 65 years undergoing abdominal cancer surgery, reported results on objective preoperative physical assessment such as Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET), field walk tests or muscle strength, and on postoperative outcomes. Results: 23 publications were included (10 CPET, 13 non-CPET including Timed Up & Go, grip strength, 6minute walking test (6MWT) and incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT)). Meta-analysis was precluded due to heterogeneity between study cohorts, different cut-off points, and inconsistent reporting of outcomes. In CPET studies, ventilatory anaerobic threshold and minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production gradient were associated with adverse outcomes. ISWT and 6MWT predicted outcomes in two studies. Tests addressing muscle strength and function were of limited value. No study compared different physical tests. Discussion: CPET has the ability to predict adverse postoperative outcomes, but it is time-consuming and requires expert assessment. ISWT or 6MWT might be a feasible alternative to estimate aerobic capacity. Muscle strength and function tests currently have limited value in risk prediction. Future research should compare the predictive value of different physical instruments with regard to postoperative outcomes in older surgical patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Argillander et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Abdominal cancer surgery. Objective preoperative physical assessment (e.g., CPET, walk tests, muscle strength) was evaluated on Postoperative outcomes. Preoperative Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing and walk tests predicted adverse postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery, though meta-analysis was precluded.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: