Randomized trial demonstrates enhanced sensitivity and accuracy in wearable tactile sensors, suggesting advancements in human–machine interaction.
Flexible fiber capacitive tactile sensors hold promise for wearable human–machine interaction, yet balancing sensitivity with robustness while preserving textile softness remains challenging. To mitigate this trade-off, a capacitive tactile fiber based on the dual-mechanism enhancement of gradient-porous compression and Maxwell–Wagner interfacial polarization was developed. A fiber with a radial gradient-porous architecture, comprising a liquid metal (LM)/thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) conductive core and a titanium dioxide (TiO 2 )/TPU dielectric sheath, was fabricated via coaxial wet spinning through non-solvent induced phase separation. A sub-percolating carbon nanotube/graphene oxide (CNT/GO) network was subsequently introduced onto the fiber surface to amplify the effective permittivity via interfacial charge accumulation. A sensitivity of 18.32 kPa –1, a response time of 170 ms, a hysteresis error of 4.47%, and stable signal retention over 1000 cycles were achieved. An all-textile wireless tactile platform was constructed and progressively validated from transient mouse clicking to quasi-static sitting posture monitoring (99.6% recognition accuracy) and further to a 64-key textile keyboard, where signal crosstalk was effectively decoupled through a fabric topology design and a one-dimensional convolutional neural network algorithm, yielding a character recognition accuracy of 96.36% and enabling context-aware generative artificial intelligence communication via integration with a large language model. This work demonstrates the significant potential of fiber-based tactile sensors for complex, multi-scenario human–machine interactions and provides new insights into the development of next-generation intelligent textile interaction platforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: