Prospective study assesses diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and lung auscultation for acute dyspnea causes, indicating effectiveness.
Objective: To investigate the value of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in identifying the causes of acute dyspnea (AD). Methods: In this prospective study, hospitalized adults with AD were enrolled. They underwent POCUS of the heart, lungs, and deep veins of the lower extremities, supplemented by lung auscultation (LA); all examinations were performed by an investigator blinded to the clinical diagnosis. The ultrasound profiles were compared with the clinical diagnoses to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the method. Results: A total of 150 patients, with a mean age of 65.8±15.7 years, were enrolled, and 53% were women. POCUS combined with LA showed a higher diagnostic accuracy [0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.81-0.91)] than POCUS alone [0.78 (95% CI, 0.72-0.84)]. The POCUS-based protocol showed the highest sensitivity for pleural effusion (1.0) and pericardial effusion [0.94 (95% CI, 0.81-1.00)], and the lowest sensitivity for pneumothorax (0.75 [95% CI, 0.20-1.00]) and pulmonary edema [0.78 (95% CI, 0.69-0.87)]. The examination duration was 12.5±3.9 min. Conclusions: The POCUS-based protocol was a rapid, informative tool for identifying the causes of AD in hospitalized adults, and the addition of LA further increased its diagnostic accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ALDYUKHOVA et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: