Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares trueness of 3D models from two scanning methods, indicating IOS is more accurate.
Results:The IOS group showed significantly lower RMS deviation than the CBCT group, with mean RMS values of 106.20±3.29 µm and 122.50±1.84µm, respectively (p<0.001).Color difference map analysis showed a uniform green distribution across the surface in Group A. In contrast, Group B showed increased red areas on the buccal and lingual posterior surfaces and irregular blue areas on the occlusal surfaces. Conclusion:The accuracy of LCD 3D-printed orthodontic models was significantly affected by the data acquisition method, with IOS-derived models showing superior trueness compared with CBCT-derived models.However, both methods remained within clinically acceptable limits, supporting their use for orthodontic diagnosis and appliance fabrication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
So-Ri Kim (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: