Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis compares oncological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open surgery for cT4b rectal cancer, suggesting safety in selected cases.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including laparoscopic and robotic approaches, is increasingly used for rectal cancer but evidence of multivisceral resection (MVR) for cT4b disease by MIS is limited. This study compared short- and long-term outcomes between patients who underwent MIS or open MVR for advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 32 patients with cT4b rectal cancer who underwent rectal resection with MVR at six institutions between 2011 and 2023 (open, n=9; MIS, n=23). Operative invasiveness, postoperative complications, and 3-year survival were evaluated. After excluding those with stage IV disease (open, n=9; MIS, n=20), pathological outcomes and 3-year survival did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: MIS may reduce invasiveness without compromising oncological outcomes in selected patients with cT4b rectal cancer requiring MVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nambara et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: