Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Performance evaluation of optical sensors using different materials for enhanced touch localisation accuracy.
Providing feedback information on touch is crucial in human–robot collaboration tasks. Within the framework of the HE SestoSenso project, a novel approach to touch sensing was developed by exploiting the properties of laser beam propagation in light-guide materials, and three different prototype sensory surfaces were fabricated. For the proposed OptoSkin robot-body optical sensor surface, which employs a time-of-flight (ToF) sensor combined with a light-guide material, a performance evaluation was conducted. Using a controlled test robot cell, two experiments were carried out: a field-of-view (FoV) assessment and a localisation accuracy evaluation. Three different prototypes made from optically transparent but distinct materials were examined: acrylic glass, a 3D-printed material, and soft silicone rubber. The localisation evaluation was performed by applying controlled forces with a robot on a rectangular grid, with a raster spacing of 10 mm between individual touch locations. The evaluation results confirm accurate touch localisation, with an error of less than 5 mm and a variability of less than 2 mm in the sensor FoV. The comparison of the OptoSkin prototypes shows the best performance for the soft silicone rubber material and the worst for the 3D-printed material.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zore et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: