Humanistic thought in medical dao: a cross-cultural perspective of global medical humanities

Rooted in “the real human being and their practice”, the humanistic thought of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) encompasses four core dimensions: the Theory of Valuing Life and Attaining Sagehood, the Theory of Temperament and Human Nature, the Theory of Subject Mutual Benefit, and the Theory of Body-State Synchronism. It provides crucial support for the mutual learning of Chinese and Western medical humanities. The Theory of Valuing Life and Attaining Sagehood resonates with Western bioethics while adding a unique dimension of spiritual self-cultivation; the Theory of Temperament and Human Nature aligns with the precision medicine paradigm and complements the perspective of cultural ethical examination; the Theory of Subject Mutual Benefit firmly opposes the objectification of patients and theoretically expands the Western concept of “patient-centered care”; the Theory of Body-State Synchronism integrates individual physical and mental health with collective public well-being, aligning with the core values of contemporary global health governance. As an ideological system deeply embedded in Chinese civilization, it takes the Qi ontology and Yin-Yang balance as its profound metaphysical foundation, constructing a holistic medical humanistic paradigm independent of the Western biomedical model. In the contemporary academic context where medical humanities are moving toward pluralistic coexistence, the value of non-Western medical traditions has attracted increasing scholarly attention. It can not only enrich the Western medical humanistic tradition through cross-cultural dialogue but also provide solid ethical support for the global dissemination and clinical practice of TCM, ultimately realizing two-way mutual learning, complementarity and symbiosis between Eastern and Western medical humanities across cultures.