Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines sanitizer effectiveness on Listeria biofilms in varying nutrient conditions, indicating surface type matters.
The ability of Listeria monocytogenes to attach to surfaces and form a biofilm while surviving in cold environments increases the risk of cross-contamination in the food processing environment (FPE). This study aims to determine which food contact surface (FCS) materials favor L. monocytogenes biofilm formation and survival under a nutrient-promoting and nutrient-limiting condition. The antimicrobial efficacy of three sanitizers (5% lactic acid, 200 ppm chlorine, 200 ppm quaternary ammonium compound) against biofilms formed under the two nutrient environments was also studied. A five-strain cocktail of L. monocytogenes grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB) was used to develop biofilms on four different FCS coupons (1 × 1 cm): acetal, nitrile, rubber, and stainless steel. Under the nutrient-promoting condition, coupons were subjected to a 72-h incubation period consisting of TSB refreshment every 24 h followed by sanitizer treatment. Nutrient-limiting coupons were subjected to the treatments after an additional 14-day storage period at 4.4°C with no nutrients following the initial 3-day incubation period. Results demonstrated biofilm-associated cell populations exceeded 6.75 log CFU/cm 2 on all surface types under the nutrient-promoting condition. The nutrient-limiting condition resulted in reduced microbial populations on all surface types of 6.21-6.48 log CFU/cm 2 . While sanitizer efficacy was dependent on surface type, all sanitizers achieved significant reductions ( P <0.05) in comparison to the control under both conditions. Lactic acid consistently resulted in a greater reduction ( P <0.05) throughout both conditions. This study affirms the ability of L. monocytogenes to adhere to and form a biofilm on various food contact surfaces utilized in the FPE, to survive in a nutrient-depleted environment, and may suggest that sanitizer efficacy against biofilms is dependent on the surface type used as a substrate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carvajal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: