Key result
Ticagrelor linked to ~77% fewer 30-day ischemic events vs clopidogrel in stented CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers reduces perioperative ischemic events during endovascular treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Does ticagrelor reduce ischemic events in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers undergoing intracranial aneurysm stenting compared to clopidogrel?
Cohort (n=654)
Does ticagrelor reduce ischemic events in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers undergoing intracranial aneurysm stenting compared to clopidogrel?
Ticagrelor is an effective and safe alternative to clopidogrel for preventing ischemic events in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers undergoing intracranial aneurysm stenting.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support ticagrelor over clopidogrel in CYP2C19 LOF carriers for aneurysm stenting; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Objectives This study aimed to evaluate whether replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor in CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) carriers can reduce the incidence of perioperative ischemic events in endovascular treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Methods A retrospective cohort of 654 patients was divided into three groups based on their CYP2C19 genotype and P2Y12 antagonist regimen: the non-LOF group (n=240, using clopidogrel), the LOF-Clopidogrel group (n=309, using clopidogrel), and the LOF-Ticagrelor group (n=105, using ticagrelor). The primary endpoint was ischemic events within 30 days postoperatively, and the safety endpoint was bleeding events within 30 days postoperatively. Results Compared with the non-LOF group (3.3%), the risk of ischemic events was significantly higher in the LOF-Clopidogrel group (7.8%; OR 2.442, 95% CI 1.072 to 5.248, P=0.028). For LOF carriers, after replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor, the incidence of ischemic events decreased to 1.9%, which was lower than that of the LOF-Clopidogrel group (1.9% vs 7.8%; OR 0.231, 95% CI 0.053 to 0.866, P=0.032), and there was no significant difference between the two groups in the overall incidence of bleeding (2.9% vs 1.3%, P=0.377). Increasing age (OR 1.043, P=0.028), non-saccular aneurysm (OR 3.196, P=0.012), and clopidogrel use in LOF carriers (OR 2.437, P=0.035) were independent risk factors for ischemic events. Conclusions CYP2C19 LOF alleles significantly increase ischemic risks following IA stenting. Implementing a ticagrelor alternative strategy for LOF carriers can significantly reduce the risk of ischemic events without increasing the risk of perioperative bleeding events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (n=654). Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Ischemic events within 30 days postoperatively (OR 0.231, 95% CI 0.053 to 0.866, p=0.032). In CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers undergoing intracranial aneurysm stenting, ticagrelor reduced 30-day ischemic events compared to clopidogrel.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: