Demonstrates improved segmentation of weld defects in radiographic images, suggesting enhanced assessment for quality control.
Accurate pixel-level segmentation of weld defects in radiographic images is essential for automated non-destructive testing (NDT) and quantitative weld-quality assessment. However, this task remains challenging because weld defects often exhibit severe foreground–background imbalance, ambiguous boundaries, weak grayscale contrast, and defect-like weld background structures, which can lead to boundary over-expansion and false-positive predictions. To address these issues, this paper proposes a boundary-guided feature modulation framework with false-positive suppression for weld radiographic defect segmentation. The method constructs boundary bands from training annotations and uses them only as label-derived training-time regularizers for attention-driven feature modulation and region-aware optimization; during validation and testing, no ground-truth mask, boundary band, or predicted boundary map is provided to the model. Multi-scale feature fusion is used to recover weak defect responses, boundary-guided dual attention enhances boundary-sensitive feature representation, and a false-positive suppression loss penalizes foreground leakage above a tolerated confidence margin in stable non-boundary background regions. Experiments on a real-world pipeline weld radiographic dataset containing 10,079 images show that the proposed method achieves a Dice score of 0.810±0.003, a Precision of 0.809±0.004, and a Surface Dice at 3 pixels of 0.394±0.008, outperforming representative CNN-based and Transformer-based segmentation baselines. Ablation studies, qualitative visualization, and distance-based false-positive analysis further demonstrate that the proposed framework improves contour reliability and reduces background false positives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: