Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review establishes thermophysical framework for enhancing dimensional fidelity in jewelry manufacturing using additive methods, suggesting implications for quality and efficiency.
Additive Manufacturing (AM) for jewelry applications is increasingly adopting Binder Jetting (BJ) to overcome the fusion-related limitations associated with precious metals, including unstable melt pools, excessive reflectivity, and high thermal conductivity. In this context, the present review establishes a thermophysical and manufacturability-oriented framework that redefines thermal management beyond localized melt-pool stabilization toward the furnace-scale control of densification kinetics, shrinkage evolution, atmosphere-assisted sintering, and viscoplastic deformation. Particular emphasis is placed on gold-, silver-, and platinum-based jewelry alloys, with a specific focus on the thermal, mechanical, and chemical phenomena governing Binder Jetting sintering. During consolidation, low-density green bodies (~40–65% relative density) must transform into highly dense components through extensive volumetric shrinkage and gravity-driven deformation, creating major challenges in dimensional fidelity and surface quality. The review further examines predictive viscoplastic constitutive models (SOVS/ROH), reversed-deformation compensation strategies, and atmosphere-engineering approaches for oxide reduction, pore-pressure regulation, and residual-porosity control. By linking thermophysical consolidation, dimensional fidelity, polishability, and jewelry-grade manufacturability within a hierarchical framework, this review provides a structured basis for the development of high-precision and low-waste precious-metal additive manufacturing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naeimabadi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: