This article analyzes responses to Vanessa Beecroft's performance art, exploring desire's critical role through art and philosophy.
This article studies critical and artistic responses to the performance art of Vanessa Beecroft – by Giorgio Agamben, Toxic Titties and Vaginal Davis – in order to explore desire as a critical framework. Its feminist lens is invested, not in sanitizing desire from the gaze, but in foregrounding it, in a methodological move that I call erotic materialism. I argue that Agamben’s mobilization of Beecroft’s VB55 (2005) for his philosophy of nudity relies on an effacement of the philosopher as a situated, desiring spectator. Agamben obscures the role played by desire in his own work and in Beecroft’s art, in which sex is deterritorialized for/by the market. By contrast, Cassils and Clover Leary of the Toxic Titties, who modeled for VB46 (2001), use their embodied, desiring experience as part of their materialist analysis of – and artistic intervention against – Beecroft’s work. Vaginal Davis, similarly, uses a performance as Beecroft (“VD is VB”) to tease out, expose – and even locate pleasure in – the social regulation of desire and value in Beecroft’s work. If, in Beecroft’s pieces, the erotic is a discursive field deployed for commerce, then the Toxic Titties and Vaginal Davis turn the scene of high art commerce into a field of embodied critique, risky pleasure, and desiring exploration. I conclude by analyzing the striking tonal differences between the earnest, corrective erotic materialism of the Toxic Titties, and the “terroristic,” camp, exploratory erotic materialism of Vaginal Davis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Claudia Grigg Edo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: