Review synthesizes how multiple ligand interactions affect the persistence and transmission of norovirus in food environments, indicating the need for updated control strategies.
Human norovirus (HuNoV) is the leading cause of foodborne viral gastroenteritis worldwide, yet its persistence in foods is still commonly interpreted through a simplified framework of contamination and residual survival. Accumulating evidence indicates that HuNoV persistence in food systems may be shaped by dynamic, genotype-dependent interactions with multiple classes of candidate ligands and retention mechanisms associated with hosts, food matrices, and microbiota. This review synthesizes current advances in the molecular basis and ecological consequences of these interactions, with emphasis on canonical and non-canonical glycans, HBGA-like substances, proteinaceous ligands, and bacterial surface or matrix-associated components. Structural, biophysical, and food-model studies collectively suggest that such factors may modulate capsid engagement, tissue retention, bioaccumulation, environmental stability, and, in some experimental systems, infectivity-related outcomes in representative matrices including leafy vegetables, bivalve mollusks, and bacteria-rich food environments. This multi-ligand perspective helps explain the matrix-dependent limitations of conventional washing, depuration, disinfection, and nucleic acid-based detection, as well as the frequent disconnect between measured viral signals and actual transmission risk. By linking molecular recognition to real food scenarios, this review highlights a shift from single-receptor and single-treatment perspectives toward mechanism-informed detection, risk assessment, and intervention strategies. A more integrated understanding of virus-ligand-matrix-microbiota interactions will be essential for improving the prediction and control of HuNoV foodborne transmission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: