Why the study?
Mobile health cardiac rehabilitation may improve access to care among older adults with ischemic heart disease, but engagement remains poorly understood.
What are the digital engagement phenotypes and associated factors among older adults with ischemic heart disease participating in mobile health cardiac rehabilitation?
Population
298 older adults with ischemic heart disease in the intervention arm of the RESILIENT trial
Comparison
Three digital engagement phenotypes (persistently low vs intermediate declining vs persistently high)
Design
Latent class analysis of randomized trial intervention participants
Key result
Mobile health cardiac rehabilitation engagement yielded 3 phenotypes, with persistently low engagement independently associated with non-White race (48% vs 12% vs 15%, P<0.001) and frailty.
Authors
Loading...
May warrant attention to engagement barriers in frail non-White patients; leaves open optimal strategies to boost mHealth CR uptake.
RCT (n=298)
What are the digital engagement phenotypes and associated factors among older adults with ischemic heart disease participating in mobile health cardiac rehabilitation?
Engagement with mobile health cardiac rehabilitation varies significantly among older adults, with non-White and frail patients showing persistently lower engagement and correspondingly less functional improvement.
Graves et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Ischemic heart disease (n=298). Mobile health cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Digital engagement phenotypes. Mobile health cardiac rehabilitation engagement yielded 3 phenotypes, with persistently low engagement independently associated with non-White race (48% vs 12% vs 15%, P<0.001) and frailty.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: