Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines urban–rural integration strategies in Guiyang City, suggesting a new path for sustainable governance.
The traditional urbanization path based on scale expansion is unsustainable in karst mountainous regions due to fragmented topography and ecological fragility. Taking Guiyang City as a case study, this paper constructs two evaluation indicator systems for urban–rural development and environmental support. Employing the entropy method, coupled coordination degree model, Grey relational analysis, Geodetector, and multi-source spatial analysis methods to examine the evolutionary trajectory, driving mechanisms, and spatial responses of the human–land system from 2000 to 2024. The results show three main findings. First, the comprehensive score of Guiyang’s urban–rural human–land system increased from 0.054 to 0.826, and the coupling coordination degree rose from 0.223 (relative imbalance) in 2000 to 0.903 (high-quality coordination) in 2024, while the environmental support system deviated from the classic environmental Kuznets curve. Second, the driving force has shifted from economic scale to green well-being. The interaction analysis using Geodetector shows that all interaction types fall under the category of two-factor enhancement, among which the interaction coefficient between the number of broadband internet subscribers and other driving factors has the highest explanatory power, with a q-value of 0.949. Third, spatially, the light center distribution stabilized after 2015, and the land use ecological transition index dropped from 0.162 to 0.050 while the D-value continued rising, showing a significant negative correlation (r = −0.89, p < 0.05). Construction land was concentrated in low-slope (0–6°) and mid-elevation (1000–1400 m) basin areas, overlapping with high-quality farmland, and the synchronization rate between economically active areas and construction expansion was 50%. These findings reveal a digital–ecological co-evolution path in karst regions and provide an empirical basis for urban–rural integration governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: