Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares efficiency of DES and ethanol for extracting polyphenols from onions, suggesting improved recovery times.
Deep eutectic solvents (DES) emerge as sustainable alternatives for antioxidant polyphenol extraction; however, their analytical performance and compatibility with antioxidant assays remain insufficiently characterized. A choline chloride-urea-water DES (1:2:4) was compared with 70% ethanol for extracting polyphenols from onion bulbs and peels from cultivars grown in Spain and North Macedonia. Extraction conditions were selected through a comparative evaluation of vortex- and ultrasound-assisted extraction and benchmarked against conventional ethanolic stirring (2 h). Two-way ANOVA identified solvent composition as the main determinant of total phenolic content (F(1,20) = 1526.28, p < 0.001), while extraction method significantly influenced recovery under DES conditions (F(2,30) = 408.52, p < 0.001). The selected UAE-DES protocol increased TPC up to 2.2-fold and reduced extraction time to <5 min. TPC ranged from 25 to 44 mg GAE/g dw in bulbs and 42–62 mg GAE/g dw in peels, with red cultivars showing the highest values. UHPLC-MS/MS revealed solvent-dependent selectivity: ethanol favored flavonols (quercetin 5–11 mg/g dw), whereas DES enhanced phenolic acids (gallic acid up to 0.3 mg/g dw; protocatechuic acid up to 7 mg/g dw). FRAP correlated with TPC (r = 0.64–0.92), while ABTS was incompatible with DES extracts. Storage reduced TPC by 45–75% but preserved cultivar ranking. These findings demonstrate that UAE-DES enables rapid and efficient polyphenol recovery while highlighting the need to validate antioxidant assays in non-conventional solvents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jankulovska et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: